"Temper" (Telugu Film Review)

NTR Jr. has been on a leather hunt for a long time. Like many top heroes, he has been waiting for blockbuster by flipping movies with hit-directors. With "Temper", NTR Jr. and his fans will finally heave a sigh of relief. No, it is not a blockbuster but it is one of the above-average films for the talented actor which will lift his fortunes. In little over two hours, director Puri Jagannadh scripts a story that revolves solely around NTR Jr. as a police SI with shades of grey. That's not new as "Pataas" also has a similar treatment. The difference between "Pataas" and "Temper" is in the degree of seriousness that Puri builds into the plot in the second half - taking NTR Jr.'s performance to an inspiring level - not seen since the times of "Raakhi" or "Simhadri". 

At a conceptual level, Puri Jagannadh is skilful in weaving screenplays out of wafer-thin, almost non-existent storylines. Most of his films are just an emotional roller-coaster ride giving the audiences entertaining bits of heroism, villainy, romance, comedy and tears. He writes dialogues, screenplay and directs the crew with punctuation points at opening, interval, pre-climax and climax scenes with an approach that seems to cover all elements of box-office success. He gets under the skin of the mass elements but mixes some class elements as well to create maximum impact. In "Temper", the film grammar he is known for hasn't changed but he has definitely mellowed down in lumping some of the cheap thrills and objectifications of women he is known to portray. He succeeds mostly in giving an engaging account of a police cop who is transformed from a "crony criminalist"  into an upright officer who polishes off the villains when the 'right cause' gets triggered thanks to girl friend Kajol Agarwal. 

The film's main objective seems entertainment but on tight leash and hence subservient to highlighting NTR in a career-redefining performance. So, Puri Jagannadh uses flashback technique and uses a reel-by-reel approach to elevating the character of NTR. He uses a side flunkie Posani Krishna Murali as a standout witness to NTR's journey from flippancy to greatness - like an audience's perception of how a hero is reborn. Posani's performance is one of the highlights of the film; he mostly gives a stare but when he speaks it impacts the audience about bonding with our feelings for the hero that change reel after reel. But for that, there are lot of forgettable scenes which are a big bore - like the scenes of romance with Kajol, the doggie scenes and the brothel scenes with Vennela Kishore. If they cut them out, overall weight of the movie might go up in terms of seriousness. Ali, who gets star treatment in Puri's movies gets a forgettable role; just a token presence. Prakash Raj gets a full-length role as a comic villain who wears half-pants and T-shirts all the time; his role gives a deja vu feeling but evokes good laughs here and there. 

What thrills the audience is the refreshing accent, body language and the characterisation of NTR. Instead of using multiple accents as Mahesh Babu did in "Aagadu", NTR  uses a consistent, high-decibel, short-'temper'ered tone that shows the volcanic anger of a policeman torn between morality and selfishness. His delivery of dialogues elevates his performance to a new high that could see repeat audience - because of the subtlety and novelty. By leaving out all the distractions that usually hamper receptivity to the acting prowess of NTR, Puri ensured this time NTR shines well taking the film entirely on his shoulders without the razzmatazz of star comedians and villains. Because of Puri's panache for restricting dialogues to preciseness, NTR never gives you a feeling of over-acting though occasional theatrical flourishes spring up in the run-ins between Prakash Raj and NTR. NTR couldn't have hoped for a better time than this film when the Nandamuri family is on a purple patch with hits like "Pataas". NTR's performance in the climax is altogether new and different than the fare before. Even if he hadn't shown his 6.5 pack (something extra) in a song, the fans wouldn't have minded. His dances were good but not different from previous films.

What pulls down the rating for an other-wise good film is music by Anup Rubens' music. It lacks melody and memorability - Puri's tastes in fine music have always been arbitrary and this film is no different in wasting an in-form music composer with a dud score. Mani Sharma gives an adept BGM score that compensates for Anup Ruben's unimpressive deck of songs. Puri also disappoints in the liberties and logic flaws taken in his approach. Like packing off dogs to Korea and shipping them back to India in 24 hours. Also, except in the last scene, NTR Jr. who is an SI never wears uniform, and uses a police jeep thats a cross between a Frontrunner and a Land Rover. The police station looks the same as that used in "Aagadu" and one never sees cops superior to NTR Jr. Wonder why nobody checks NTR's juggernaut of immoral antics until his own conscience pricks him. Next, under no circumstances does the court announce a capital punishment to gang-rape criminals within 24 hours of convicting the criminals. Puri hasn't really done a contempt of court but proves again his poor knowledge of justice system. In the climactic scene, NTR loses proof of evidence that will nail the culprits but couldn't Puri have the imagination to make NTR ask for an extra copy of the CD which may have been with the victim's sister? And when is TV5 getting aired in North America where the victim's sister is watching the proceedings? Puri also forgets that proceedings like hanging of criminals is not reported on an hourly basis. In dragging the scene in climax similar to Chiranjeevi's "Abhilasha" (where Rallapalli rolls on the floor crying hoarse "Aaapaaandeeeeeeeee..." to stop a hanging) Puri takes too many illogical cinematic liberties. Puri is known to skirt logic to prove his points but nevertheless makes an impactful, powerful film with an underlying message.The frailities take away some points but except for few lags, the film is eminently watchable for NTR Jr's tour de force performance.

Rating: 3.25/5

#Temper #NTRJr #NTR #Tollywood #MovieReviews #PuriJagannadh #TemperMovie 

"Iddarammayalatho" Movie Review (Telugu)

Puri Jagannadh is one of the cleverest directors in Tollywood who churns out more than three films per year, sometimes four by preparing scripts that encash the flavor-of-the-month phenomenon. Between last year's Sankranti and now, he directed four films including the current offering with Style Diva Allu Arjun. But I am afraid, his decline has started with the film "Businessman", reached a nadir with "Devudu Chesina Manushulu", and later on, became known as a director who creates controversy for promoting the film. As an audience, I feel betrayed whenever I see a Puri film because he has scant respect for social responsibility and is least sensitive to sentiments of women audience (even if many of them perversely watch his films). In "Iddarammayalatho", he tries to camouflage his obsession with making films for the galleries with a little more maturity but the basic plot and lacklustre screenplay gives away in this 137 minute action thriller.

Despite the hype, and despite a sterling performance by Allu Arjun  - in dances, action stunts, and romantic scenes, the film doesn't deliver on many counts - and the reason could be the fatigue setting in for Puri's stereotypes - of machismo heroes, over-glamorised heroines and sadistic villains. I feel he is misguided in all his approach to film-making which makes even icons like Mahesh and Pawan Kalyan and Allu Arjun flock to him for direction in the hope of adding  a hit to their credit. Every frame in the film is fraught with dishonesty and deceipt - to manipulate emotions of the audience. And all this he takes liberties with the storyline frothed up from a basic one-line. The story goes like this here. Sanju Reddy (Allu Arjun) is a guitarist who falls in love with Komali (Amala Paul) who is learning violin under Brahmanandam - in Barcelona, Spain (Thank God, it's not Bangkok again!). One day, she shoots, by mistake, a murder being committed by a Gangster villain on the beach. The villains chase her down, kidnap her and make many attempts to eliminate her. Meanwhile, as the parents of both agree to come down to bless them as married, the villains kill the parents of both even as Komali and Sanju escape. This is the flashback portion, the narration actually moves in the voice of  another girl Akanksha (Catherine Theresa) who is reading a diary of Amala Paul (which itself turns out to be another twist). In learning about the diary, Akanksha falls in love with Sanju and then it takes a routine turn except that the diary itself is "planted" by Sanju so that Akanksha reads it and falls in love with him because her father, a minister (Rao Ramesh) and the gangster are partners-in-crime for a Rs. One lakh crore scam. Sanju takes revenge and settles down, we are to believe, with the two glam dolls. The storyline appears long but the screenplay is better. 

Even if the first half is more entertaining than the second half, the film's watchability is because of Allu Arjun. His uber cool dresses, stylish body language and his repertoire of dancing skills and acrobatic stunts makes him a good draw despite the presence of two glamorous faces. The best paisa-vasool moment of the film is the action sequence before the interval. Anyone wanting to make a transition from ugly looks to handsome looks should study the career graph of Allu Arjun - it is quite unparalleled. Amala Paul's performance is below-par and it appears this Kerala lass is incapable of outgrowing her shy looks and demure body language. Catherine Theresa has carried herself far better - she seems effortless in Indian dresses, has better scenes than Amala and has a screen presence. Comedy track is a big let-down for the film. Puri's obsession with Ali is not yielding success and the scenes between Brahmanandam and Ali are pure disaster. Puri is losing touch with what can fire up comedy. He also has to treat the audience with more respect, intelligence and sensibilities. In a scene where Catherine is packing off to Spain, she wears scantiest dress which you don't wear in front of your mother. And it is the father in whose presence, she is packing the clothes. In most other scenes, when the narration is pathos, he shows Catherine in min shorts baring her thighs and cleavage, that is absurd sensibility. Puri's respect for intelligence is also well-known; there are references to mining scams and CBI without reason or rationale, the second heroine Catherine who comes to Spain for studies doesn't go to college even once, all she does is to read Amala's diary and date Allu Arjun. And most of the dialogues are sexist - there are atleast four dialogues on why boys are taken for a ride by girls in the name of love, why boys losing virginity is never an issue, why girls are insensitive to boys' advances...it is these kind of dialogues that are corrupting the society and increasing crimes against women. Puri's count of felonies doesn't end with these manipulative dialogues - he talks casteism through characters which was unwarranted. He coins a word "Bapinese" to connotate converted Brahmins and also makes mockery of "Reddys" while insinuating grandeur. All this is not serious stuff, but Puri's style of directing, characterisation and story-telling smacks of a certain irresponsibility which will appeal to basic instincts of men not elevate them. According to me, his films will one day be housed in the "Hall of Shame". 2 out of 5 is my rating.

"Businessman" Movie Review

“Businessman” has opened to unprecedented fanfare and release with some 1600 prints and 134 theatres in Hyderabad alone. Being a Mahesh Babu-Puri Jagannath combination, its naturally on the cusp of heightened expectations. To a very large extent, the movie delivers with extra-ordinary entertainment in the first half and almost into the second half just on the basis of terrific screenplay, dialogues and maverick story-telling ability of Puri Jagannath with the magical screen presence of Mahesh Babu shows his natural knack of being an angry young man under tight leash and delivers a stylish performance with uninhibited looks, surprising close chemistry with Kajal (heroine) and dances that show him in better light than in recent times.


Most of the improved trappings of “Dookudu” in terms of better eye-contact, body language and finesse are what makes this movie mostly watchable except some portions of the second half which drag and sometimes bore. Fans will be delighted to hear so many mouthful and height-of-manhood dialogues in one movie – if there’s a soundtrack of dialogues – I probably will buy one – Puri’s pen shows sharpness and wit – this movie will probably have more one-liners than all his previous movies and don’t get misled by the cheesy advertorials of the hero vowing to make Mumbai piss in its pants – there are much more. Kajal is perhaps shown in more skimpy clothing and this is her boldest look after “Dhada” (Nag Chaitanya). Atleast two songs are well-choreographed and well worth – “Saarosthara” and “Chaavve”.

Even though the first half is under-fed on graphic violence, Puri compensates well in second half – the violence of “Pokiri” fame and even a liplock with Kajal. What mars the movie is this violence in the second half and the flimsy grounds on which the hero justifies it saying that since we kill so many mammals and amphibians daily - even this is justifiable - is ridiculous. Mahesh has shown so much restraint and responsibility in filtering out violence in “Dookudu” embraces it with both hands and plenty of guns in this movie – this can put anybody out of mind. The other bane in the movie is lack of a single-card Villain of the piece. Who is it? Not Prakash Raj. Not Nazar. Not Shinde. Not Subbaraju.

Nobody successfully contests Mahesh as a villain for too long – and nobody gets the lines or attention that’s worth their salt. And comedy – none of it in the second half. Most of the comedy, if you notice it, is in the first half and comes as fleeting in bits during the way the romance gets built up between the hero and his muse. Story-wise, there are many shades that resemble most of Puri’s films even though he gives a new extra-constitutional, legalistic license to create arson and loot by the hero who acts like a Robinhood- a law unto himself – in a bid to correct corrupt politicians and ill-bred criminal elements in the system. No Brahmanandam, No Ali (surprise) and No Jeeva – no comedy track at all but still the movie sustains very well until the 9th reel *(out of the 14 reels). With so much analysis for and against the movie, is the movie good to watch? It is mostly watchable– because of the narrative speed and story-telling of Puri Jagannath and Mahesh’s magical presence. Music by Thaman is good in BGM and atleast three songs. Some experiments in the movie are breaking a pattern – like no song till 30 minutes of the movie, no formal comedian, no villain of identifiable length – will have to see whether the fans lap it.

Film Production Costs and Satellite Rights of Movies

"Businessman" is releasing on 13th and "Bodyguard" on 14th. Good for both. But there's a new twist in "Businessman". For the first time, it seems, the satellite rights of "Businessman" are sold on a revolving basis instead of being sold for a longish period of 5 yrs or so. This time, Puri Jaganadh, the maverick director who worked non-stop for 77 days schedule of the movie has done what smart Bollywood producers are doing. He bought the satellite rights of the movie for a whopping Rs.7.7 crs - Rs.5 crores as his remuneration for the movie (Wow!) and Rs.2.7 crs. as "Eduru Katnam" making it an unheard of figure for satellite rights for any Tollywood movie. For the first round of limited period - MAA TV gets the rights. Interesting times for Tollywood producers and directors - satellite rights are fetching good monies.


"Sri Rama Rajyam" has fetched its benevolent producer Saibabu Rs.4.50 crs. and so on. In times of yore, you had none of this - I remember once "Shankarabharanam" producer Edida Nageswar Rao was flying with me - and he told me that most of his classics were sold to SunTV for a song - as long as Rs.5 lacs or so. Times have changed and even Directors are thinking like a "Businessman"!

The onus shifts to Satellite TVs to make money - MAA TV holds the rights of almost all the top ten all-time grossers of Tollywood in the last five years, Gemini and Zee come up with occasional movies which get the eyeballs still, while ETV goes for the ever-green mix of vintage movies with high family entertainment. I was once educated by a Respected Media Advisor on how TV Channels like MAA TV made huge money by betting on movies which nobody guessed would become "multi-baggers" like "Pokiri" and "Simham" - that is what I call scientific betting. But when the stakes get higher like Rs.4 crs to Rs.7 crs. it becomes difficult to make money unless you show the movie atleast 20 times within the period the rights are bought for - say, five years and so on.

There is another game in this whole buying - and most often, it appears to me, the smart producers and directors will create a story to pump-prime the winning bid. They will say, "this movie cost us Rs.40 crs." It will not always be true. OR, it will be hopelessly true sometimes. For example, in "Srirama Rajyam" movie, the opening shot of the movie shows Rama and Sita ushered in at Ayodhya with flowers. That shot - remember? Originally, Bapu Uncle wanted rich quality flowers costing Rs.5000/- for them. Producer SaiBabu wass not available on the shot and the Production Controller said "Sorry Sir, that is not possible because we dont have sanction beyond Rs.500/- for this shot." Bapu Uncle said, "Okay, whatever, let us have it for Rs.500/-". When the director and the producer were reviewing the shots, Producer Saibabu wanted a richer look for the shot and asked Bapu uncle why costlier flowers were not used. Bapu uncle said, "Your man didn't allow us to buy costly flowers so we made do with flowers worth only Rs.500/-only. But we can digitise the effect to reflect higher quality." Saibabu gave a go-ahead. The final bill - from what should have been Rs.5000/- for flowers came as a shock to Saibabu - it was Rs.5.96 lacs!

Whose fault is it? Not Bapu Uncle - he is known for strict budgeting and cost control. It was the mistake of the Production Controller who should have checked with Executive Producer or the Main producer for not cutting corners with a crucial scene like that. Fifteen or more of such special effects, and you will easily incur a few crores more. Thats how film costs go up - but as I said not all costs are genuine - they could be marketing ploys to cough up higher satellite revenues. Thats the main point of this story - not to poke fun at anybody.