There is only one gold standard of writing in English methinks - Pulitzer. You have many literary awards for Writing in English (WiE) like the Man Booker, FT Awards etc. but none come close to the award instituted by the Columbia School of Journalism - for writing in English. I keep throwing my savings to acquire the collection of Puliltizer prize-winning entries. Ever since I got to know there is somebody called Joseph Pulitzer and there is an anthology called Pultizer Prize collection, I have been buying since 1991. Of course, I perfectly agree there is outstanding literary output coming in non-English too every minute but Pulitzer is up there for American Writing in English and their standards are too rigorous. Most of the American writers we revere since 1917 -the legendary Christopher Hitchens, Paul Krugman, Dave Barry, Nicholas Kristoff, Joe Nocera, Mitch Albom, Maureen Dowd, Anna Quindlen, Art Buchwald, William Safire, Russell Baker and Roger Cohen - they were always feted here first and cited and celebrated before they became icons of English Language Writing.
2012 awards have been announced - and their categories are as always varietal and calibrated - Pultizer for Explanatory Reporting (as in explaining "sub prime crisis"), Pulitizer for Breaking News, Puliltzer for local reporting, Pultizer for International Reporting, Pulitzer for writing on music, biography or autobiography, history, drama, commentary, feature writing, criticism, etc. A Pulitizer for poetry also - thats the respect and veneer the Pulitizer committee has for all departments of journalism and writing. If the standards are not met, NO AWARD. Surprise, this year, NO AWARDS for FICTION. (Howzzaat???) and NO AWARD for Editorial Writing. This is truly outstanding - why dilute the standards instead of giving to the undeserved? No other literary award matches these standards. Of course, it is Americana all the way - this is for American journalism/writers who are American Citizens. No wonder, Jhumpa Lahiri got it once - not Naipaul of East Indian origins. Of course, there is criticism that these awards are a jingoistic celebration of American Publishing phenomena - but thats the truth - they are the most literate society. India publishes 80,000 books a year but US publishes probably as many number in a quarter, if not more.
I envision a scenario where we will have over the next quarter century more categories of writing introduced by Columbia School to cover the invasion of web-based writing and the many faces of social media. Right now, Columbia School has a New Media division which has asked the US Library of Congress to archive every tweet that goes out of the 200 million user ids every nanosecond anywhere in the world. But I guess giving awards for tweets and facebook posts is tough and difficult. Good Writing is writing thats edited, as David Ogilvy used to say, atleast 13 times. That kind of luxury is impossible to attend on facebook or twitter or blogs without comprising on the qualities of relevance and immediacy. Anyway, whether or not that happens, Pulitzer will live on as long as American English thrives - and readership for elegant writing exists. Congrats to Pulitzer-prize winners - Surprise, no winners from "The Atlantic", "Harpers" or "The New Yorker". Are we getting there? I mean, shorter.
2012 awards have been announced - and their categories are as always varietal and calibrated - Pultizer for Explanatory Reporting (as in explaining "sub prime crisis"), Pulitizer for Breaking News, Puliltzer for local reporting, Pultizer for International Reporting, Pulitzer for writing on music, biography or autobiography, history, drama, commentary, feature writing, criticism, etc. A Pulitizer for poetry also - thats the respect and veneer the Pulitizer committee has for all departments of journalism and writing. If the standards are not met, NO AWARD. Surprise, this year, NO AWARDS for FICTION. (Howzzaat???) and NO AWARD for Editorial Writing. This is truly outstanding - why dilute the standards instead of giving to the undeserved? No other literary award matches these standards. Of course, it is Americana all the way - this is for American journalism/writers who are American Citizens. No wonder, Jhumpa Lahiri got it once - not Naipaul of East Indian origins. Of course, there is criticism that these awards are a jingoistic celebration of American Publishing phenomena - but thats the truth - they are the most literate society. India publishes 80,000 books a year but US publishes probably as many number in a quarter, if not more.
I envision a scenario where we will have over the next quarter century more categories of writing introduced by Columbia School to cover the invasion of web-based writing and the many faces of social media. Right now, Columbia School has a New Media division which has asked the US Library of Congress to archive every tweet that goes out of the 200 million user ids every nanosecond anywhere in the world. But I guess giving awards for tweets and facebook posts is tough and difficult. Good Writing is writing thats edited, as David Ogilvy used to say, atleast 13 times. That kind of luxury is impossible to attend on facebook or twitter or blogs without comprising on the qualities of relevance and immediacy. Anyway, whether or not that happens, Pulitzer will live on as long as American English thrives - and readership for elegant writing exists. Congrats to Pulitzer-prize winners - Surprise, no winners from "The Atlantic", "Harpers" or "The New Yorker". Are we getting there? I mean, shorter.
